In 1776, the political choice facing Americans was stark: remain subjects of the British Crown or break from it entirely. The Declaration of Independence settled that question. But a loose and fragile union of former colonies remained. The Articles of Confederation bound these new states together, but left too little power with the federal government.
In the summer of 1787, 55 delegates from 12 states (Rhode Island declined) gathered for a Constitutional Convention. Their task was to draft a new constitution defining a more robust role for the federal government while preserving certain authority for the states. The structure of our government and the laws we live under – and still debate – come from the Constitution.
The Virginia delegation arrived in Philadelphia a week early. James Madison lobbied for support for his belief that the country needed a new form of government. Madison’s ideas became the principles of the Virginia Plan, which Gov. Edmund Randolph introduced to the delegates. For the next four months, the Virginia Plan served as the foundation for debate of the new Constitution.
The Constitution is not a monument to agreement. The men argued over nearly every clause. It is a monument to compromise. They understood that ideological sacrifices were preferable to losing the nation. Their constitution – now ours – endures.
In 2026, the nation is again sharply divided. The questions pressing hardest on our constitutional system – the consent of the governed, separation of powers, representation and the size of Congress, the presidency, and the moral assumptions underpinning the Constitution – have remained with us for 250 years.
The mission of this series is to give readers insights into how the Founding Fathers debated and addressed the issues we still contest today.
No verbatim transcripts from the Constitutional Convention or the state ratification conventions exist. The primary sources for the series are James Madison’s Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787, Max Farrand’s The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, and Jonathan Elliot’s The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution. These provide the most complete account of the Founders’ intent for the Constitution, and are relied on by scholars and federal judges. Quotations attributed to the Founders throughout this series are drawn from these recorded accounts.
The Founders were men of their time, flawed and compromised in ways that history reminds us. They placed the source of authority not in kings, not in states, not in the loudest voices, but in the people themselves. That is the American proposition — difficult and unfinished.
—------
Philip Shucet spent decades running large public institutions — the Virginia Department of Transportation and Hampton Roads Transit — during periods when they were under strain. He understands how they are built, how they break down, and what it takes to rebuild them. He is a graduate of Virginia Tech and the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism. He has begun doctoral research in law and policy.